Title: |
Rerum Novarum
|
Descr.: |
On Capital And Labor (or "On The Condition Of The Working Classes")
|
Pope: |
Pope Leo XIII
|
Date: |
May 15, 1891
|
|
To
Our Venerable Brethren the Patriarchs, Primates, Archbishops,
Bishops, and Other Ordinaries of Places Having Peace and Communion
with the Apostolic See.
Rights
and Duties of Capital and Labor
1.
That the spirit of revolutionary change, which has long been
disturbing the nations of the world, should have passed beyond the
sphere of politics and made its influence felt in the cognate
sphere of practical economics is not surprising. The elements of
the conflict now raging are unmistakable, in the vast expansion of
industrial pursuits and the marvelous discoveries of science; in
the changed relations between masters and workmen; in the enormous
fortunes of some few individuals, and the utter poverty of the
masses; in the increased self-reliance and closer mutual
combination of the working classes; as also, finally, in the
prevailing moral degeneracy. The momentous gravity of the state of
things now obtaining fills every mind with painful apprehension;
wise men are discussing it; practical men are proposing schemes;
popular meetings, legislatures, and rulers of nations are all
busied with it - actually there is no question which has taken
deeper hold on the public mind.
2.
Therefore, venerable brethren, as on former occasions when it
seemed opportune to refute false teaching, We have addressed you
in the interests of the Church and of the commonweal, and have
issued letters bearing on political power, human liberty, the
Christian constitution of the State, and like matters, so have We
thought it expedient now to speak on the condition of the working
classes.(1) It is a subject on which We have already touched more
than once, incidentally. But in the present letter, the
responsibility of the apostolic office urges Us to treat the
question of set purpose and in detail, in order that no
misapprehension may exist as to the principles which truth and
justice dictate for its settlement. The discussion is not easy,
nor is it void of danger. It is no easy matter to define the
relative rights and mutual duties of the rich and of the poor, of
capital and of labor. And the danger lies in this, that crafty
agitators are intent on making use of these differences of opinion
to pervert men's judgments and to stir up the people to revolt.
3.
In any case we clearly see, and on this there is general
agreement, that some opportune remedy must be found quickly for
the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority
of the working class: for the ancient workingmen's guilds were
abolished in the last century, and no other protective
organization took their place. Public institutions and the laws
set aside the ancient religion. Hence, by degrees it has come to
pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and
helpless, to the hard-heartedness of employers and the greed of
unchecked competition. The mischief has been increased by
rapacious usury, which, although more than once condemned by the
Church, is nevertheless, under a different guise, but with like
injustice, still practiced by covetous and grasping men. To this
must be added that the hiring of labor and the conduct of trade
are concentrated in the hands of comparatively few; so that a
small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the
teeming masses of the laboring poor a yoke little better than that
of slavery itself.
4.
To remedy these wrongs the socialists, working on the poor man's
envy of the rich, are striving to do away with private property,
and contend that individual possessions should become the common
property of all, to be administered by the State or by municipal
bodies. They hold that by thus transferring property from private
individuals to the community, the present mischievous state of
things will be set to rights, inasmuch as each citizen will then
get his fair share of whatever there is to enjoy. But their
contentions are so clearly powerless to end the controversy that
were they carried into effect the working man himself would be
among the first to suffer. They are, moreover, emphatically
unjust, for they would rob the lawful possessor, distort the
functions of the State, and create utter confusion in the
community.
5.
It is surely undeniable that, when a man engages in remunerative
labor, the impelling reason and motive of his work is to obtain
property, and thereafter to hold it as his very own. If one man
hires out to another his strength or skill, he does so for the
purpose of receiving in return what is necessary for the
satisfaction of his needs; he therefore expressly intends to
acquire a right full and real, not only to the remuneration, but
also to the disposal of such remuneration, just as he pleases.
Thus, if he lives sparingly, saves money, and, for greater
security, invests his savings in land, the land, in such case, is
only his wages under another form; and, consequently, a working
man's little estate thus purchased should be as completely at his
full disposal as are the wages he receives for his labor. But it
is precisely in such power of disposal that ownership obtains,
whether the property consist of land or chattels. Socialists,
therefore, by endeavoring to transfer the possessions of
individuals to the community at large, strike at the interests of
every wage earner, since they would deprive him of the liberty of
disposing of his wages, and thereby of all hope and possibility of
increasing his resources and of bettering his condition in life.
6.
What is of far greater moment, however, is the fact that the
remedy they propose is manifestly against justice. For, every man
has by nature the right to possess property as his own. This is
one of the chief points of distinction between man and the animal
creation, for the brute has no power of self-direction, but is
governed by two main instincts, which keep his powers on the
alert, impel him to develop them in a fitting manner, and
stimulate and determine him to action without any power of choice.
One of these instincts is self-preservation, the other the
propagation of the species. Both can attain their purpose by means
of things which lie within range; beyond their verge the brute
creation cannot go, for they are moved to action by their senses
only, and in the special direction which these suggest. But with
man it is wholly different. He possesses, on the one hand, the
full perfection of the animal being, and hence enjoys at least as
much as the rest of the animal kind, the fruition of things
material. But animal nature, however perfect, is far from
representing the human being in its completeness, and is in truth
but humanity's humble handmaid, made to serve and to obey. It is
the mind, or reason, which is the predominant element in us who
are human creatures; it is this which renders a human being human,
and distinguishes him essentially from the brute. And on this very
account - that man alone among the animal creation is endowed with
reason - it must be within his right to possess things not merely
for temporary and momentary use, as other living things do, but to
have and to hold them in stable and permanent possession; he must
have not only things that perish in the use, but those also which,
though they have been reduced into use, continue for further use
in time.
7.
This becomes still more clearly evident if man's nature be
considered a little more deeply. For man, fathoming by his faculty
of reason matters without number, linking the future with the
present, and being master of his own acts, guides his ways under
the eternal law and the power of God, whose providence governs all
things. Wherefore, it is in his power to exercise his choice not
only as to matters that regard his present welfare, but also about
those which he deems may be for his advantage in time yet to come.
Hence, man not only should possess the fruits of the earth, but
also the very soil, inasmuch as from the produce of the earth he
has to lay by provision for the future. Man's needs do not die
out, but forever recur; although satisfied today, they demand
fresh supplies for tomorrow. Nature accordingly must have given to
man a source that is stable and remaining always with him, from
which he might look to draw continual supplies. And this stable
condition of things he finds solely in the earth and its fruits.
There is no need to bring in the State. Man precedes the State,
and possesses, prior to the formation of any State, the right of
providing for the substance of his body.
8.
The fact that God has given the earth for the use and enjoyment of
the whole human race can in no way be a bar to the owning of
private property. For God has granted the earth to mankind in
general, not in the sense that all without distinction can deal
with it as they like, but rather that no part of it was assigned
to any one in particular, and that the limits of private
possession have been left to be fixed by man's own industry, and
by the laws of individual races. Moreover, the earth, even though
apportioned among private owners, ceases not thereby to minister
to the needs of all, inasmuch as there is not one who does not
sustain life from what the land produces. Those who do not possess
the soil contribute their labor; hence, it may truly be said that
all human subsistence is derived either from labor on one's own
land, or from some toil, some calling, which is paid for either in
the produce of the land itself, or in that which is exchanged for
what the land brings forth.
9.
Here, again, we have further proof that private ownership is in
accordance with the law of nature. Truly, that which is required
for the preservation of life, and for life's well-being, is
produced in great abundance from the soil, but not until man has
brought it into cultivation and expended upon it his solicitude
and skill. Now, when man thus turns the activity of his mind and
the strength of his body toward procuring the fruits of nature, by
such act he makes his own that portion of nature's field which he
cultivates - that portion on which he leaves, as it were, the
impress of his personality; and it cannot but be just that he
should possess that portion as his very own, and have a right to
hold it without any one being justified in violating that right.
10.
So strong and convincing are these arguments that it seems amazing
that some should now be setting up anew certain obsolete opinions
in opposition to what is here laid down. They assert that it is
right for private persons to have the use of the soil and its
various fruits, but that it is unjust for any one to possess
outright either the land on which he has built or the estate which
he has brought under cultivation. But those who deny these rights
do not perceive that they are defrauding man of what his own labor
has produced. For the soil which is tilled and cultivated with
toil and skill utterly changes its condition; it was wild before,
now it is fruitful; was barren, but now brings forth in abundance.
That which has thus altered and improved the land becomes so truly
part of itself as to be in great measure indistinguishable and
inseparable from it. Is it just that the fruit of a man's own
sweat and labor should be possessed and enjoyed by any one else?
As effects follow their cause, so is it just and right that the
results of labor should belong to those who have bestowed their
labor.
11.
With reason, then, the common opinion of mankind, little affected
by the few dissentients who have contended for the opposite view,
has found in the careful study of nature, and in the laws of
nature, the foundations of the division of property, and the
practice of all ages has consecrated the principle of private
ownership, as being preeminently in conformity with human nature,
and as conducing in the most unmistakable manner to the peace and
tranquillity of human existence. The same principle is confirmed
and enforced by the civil laws - laws which, so long as they are
just, derive from the law of nature their binding force. The
authority of the divine law adds its sanction, forbidding us in
severest terms even to covet that which is another's: "Thou
shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife; nor his house, nor his field,
nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his
ass, nor anything that is his."(2)
12.
The rights here spoken of, belonging to each individual man, are
seen in much stronger light when considered in relation to man's
social and domestic obligations. In choosing a state of life, it
is indisputable that all are at full liberty to follow the counsel
of Jesus Christ as to observing virginity, or to bind themselves
by the marriage tie. No human law can abolish the natural and
original right of marriage, nor in any way limit the chief and
principal purpose of marriage ordained by God's authority from the
beginning: "Increase and multiply."(3) Hence we have the
family, the "society" of a man's house - a society very
small, one must admit, but none the less a true society, and one
older than any State. Consequently, it has rights and duties
peculiar to itself which are quite independent of the State.
13.
That right to property, therefore, which has been proved to belong
naturally to individual persons, must in like wise belong to a man
in his capacity of head of a family; nay, that right is all the
stronger in proportion as the human person receives a wider
extension in the family group. It is a most sacred law of nature
that a father should provide food and all necessaries for those
whom he has begotten; and, similarly, it is natural that he should
wish that his children, who carry on, so to speak, and continue
his personality, should be by him provided with all that is
needful to enable them to keep themselves decently from want and
misery amid the uncertainties of this mortal life. Now, in no
other way can a father effect this except by the ownership of
productive property, which he can transmit to his children by
inheritance. A family, no less than a State, is, as We have said,
a true society, governed by an authority peculiar to itself, that
is to say, by the authority of the father. Provided, therefore,
the limits which are prescribed by the very purposes for which it
exists be not transgressed, the family has at least equal rights
with the State in the choice and pursuit of the things needful to
its preservation and its just liberty. We say, "at least
equal rights"; for, inasmuch as the domestic household is
antecedent, as well in idea as in fact, to the gathering of men
into a community, the family must necessarily have rights and
duties which are prior to those of the community, and founded more
immediately in nature. If the citizens, if the families on
entering into association and fellowship, were to experience
hindrance in a commonwealth instead of help, and were to find
their rights attacked instead of being upheld, society would
rightly be an object of detestation rather than of desire.
14.
The contention, then, that the civil government should at its
option intrude into and exercise intimate control over the family
and the household is a great and pernicious error. True, if a
family finds itself in exceeding distress, utterly deprived of the
counsel of friends, and without any prospect of extricating
itself, it is right that extreme necessity be met by public aid,
since each family is a part of the commonwealth. In like manner,
if within the precincts of the household there occur grave
disturbance of mutual rights, public authority should intervene to
force each party to yield to the other its proper due; for this is
not to deprive citizens of their rights, but justly and properly
to safeguard and strengthen them. But the rulers of the
commonwealth must go no further; here, nature bids them stop.
Paternal authority can be neither abolished nor absorbed by the
State; for it has the same source as human life itself. "The
child belongs to the father," and is, as it were, the
continuation of the father's personality; and speaking strictly,
the child takes its place in civil society, not of its own right,
but in its quality as member of the family in which it is born.
And for the very reason that "the child belongs to the
father" it is, as St. Thomas Aquinas says, "before it
attains the use of free will, under the power and the charge of
its parents."(4) The socialists, therefore, in setting aside
the parent and setting up a State supervision, act against natural
justice, and destroy the structure of the home.
15.
And in addition to injustice, it is only too evident what an upset
and disturbance there would be in all classes, and to how
intolerable and hateful a slavery citizens would be subjected. The
door would be thrown open to envy, to mutual invective, and to
discord; the sources of wealth themselves would run dry, for no
one would have any interest in exerting his talents or his
industry; and that ideal equality about which they entertain
pleasant dreams would be in reality the leveling down of all to a
like condition of misery and degradation. Hence, it is clear that
the main tenet of socialism, community of goods, must be utterly
rejected, since it only injures those whom it would seem meant to
benefit, is directly contrary to the natural rights of mankind,
and would introduce confusion and disorder into the commonweal.
The first and most fundamental principle, therefore, if one would
undertake to alleviate the condition of the masses, must be the
inviolability of private property. This being established, we
proceed to show where the remedy sought for must be found.
16.
We approach the subject with confidence, and in the exercise of
the rights which manifestly appertain to Us, for no practical
solution of this question will be found apart from the
intervention of religion and of the Church. It is We who are the
chief guardian of religion and the chief dispenser of what
pertains to the Church; and by keeping silence we would seem to
neglect the duty incumbent on us. Doubtless, this most serious
question demands the attention and the efforts of others besides
ourselves - to wit, of the rulers of States, of employers of
labor, of the wealthy, yes, of the working classes themselves, for
whom We are pleading. But We affirm without hesitation that all
the striving of men will be vain if they leave out the Church. It
is the Church that insists, on the authority of the Gospel, upon
those teachings whereby the conflict can be brought to an end, or
rendered, at least, far less bitter; the Church uses her efforts
not only to enlighten the mind, but to direct by her precepts the
life and conduct of each and all; the Church improves and betters
the condition of the working man by means of numerous
organizations; does her best to enlist the services of all classes
in discussing and endeavoring to further in the most practical
way, the interests of the working classes; and considers that for
this purpose recourse should be had, in due measure and degree, to
the intervention of the law and of State authority.
17.
It must be first of all recognized that the condition of things
inherent in human affairs must be borne with, for it is impossible
to reduce civil society to one dead level. Socialists may in that
intent do their utmost, but all striving against nature is in
vain. There naturally exist among mankind manifold differences of
the most important kind; people differ in capacity, skill, health,
strength; and unequal fortune is a necessary result of unequal
condition. Such inequality is far from being disadvantageous
either to individuals or to the community. Social and public life
can only be maintained by means of various kinds of capacity for
business and the playing of many parts; and each man, as a rule,
chooses the part which suits his own peculiar domestic condition.
As regards bodily labor, even had man never fallen from the state
of innocence, he would not have remained wholly idle; but that
which would then have been his free choice and his delight became
afterwards compulsory, and the painful expiation for his
disobedience. "Cursed be the earth in thy work; in thy labor
thou shalt eat of it all the days of thy life."(5)
18.
In like manner, the other pains and hardships of life will have no
end or cessation on earth; for the consequences of sin are bitter
and hard to bear, and they must accompany man so long as life
lasts. To suffer and to endure, therefore, is the lot of humanity;
let them strive as they may, no strength and no artifice will ever
succeed in banishing from human life the ills and troubles which
beset it. If any there are who pretend differently - who hold out
to a hard-pressed people the boon of freedom from pain and
trouble, an undisturbed repose, and constant enjoyment - they
delude the people and impose upon them, and their lying promises
will only one day bring forth evils worse than the present.
Nothing is more useful than to look upon the world as it really
is, and at the same time to seek elsewhere, as We have said, for
the solace to its troubles.
19.
The great mistake made in regard to the matter now under
consideration is to take up with the notion that class is
naturally hostile to class, and that the wealthy and the working
men are intended by nature to live in mutual conflict. So
irrational and so false is this view that the direct contrary is
the truth. Just as the symmetry of the human frame is the result
of the suitable arrangement of the different parts of the body, so
in a State is it ordained by nature that these two classes should
dwell in harmony and agreement, so as to maintain the balance of
the body politic. Each needs the other: capital cannot do without
labor, nor labor without capital. Mutual agreement results in the
beauty of good order, while perpetual conflict necessarily
produces confusion and savage barbarity. Now, in preventing such
strife as this, and in uprooting it, the efficacy of Christian
institutions is marvelous and manifold. First of all, there is no
intermediary more powerful than religion (whereof the Church is
the interpreter and guardian) in drawing the rich and the working
class together, by reminding each of its duties to the other, and
especially of the obligations of justice.
20.
Of these duties, the following bind the proletarian and the
worker: fully and faithfully to perform the work which has been
freely and equitably agreed upon; never to injure the property,
nor to outrage the person, of an employer; never to resort to
violence in defending their own cause, nor to engage in riot or
disorder; and to have nothing to do with men of evil principles,
who work upon the people with artful promises of great results,
and excite foolish hopes which usually end in useless regrets and
grievous loss. The following duties bind the wealthy owner and the
employer: not to look upon their work people as their bondsmen,
but to respect in every man his dignity as a person ennobled by
Christian character. They are reminded that, according to natural
reason and Christian philosophy, working for gain is creditable,
not shameful, to a man, since it enables him to earn an honorable
livelihood; but to misuse men as though they were things in the
pursuit of gain, or to value them solely for their physical powers
- that is truly shameful and inhuman. Again justice demands that,
in dealing with the working man, religion and the good of his soul
must be kept in mind. Hence, the employer is bound to see that the
worker has time for his religious duties; that he be not exposed
to corrupting influences and dangerous occasions; and that he be
not led away to neglect his home and family, or to squander his
earnings. Furthermore, the employer must never tax his work people
beyond their strength, or employ them in work unsuited to their
sex and age. His great and principal duty is to give every one
what is just. Doubtless, before deciding whether wages are fair,
many things have to be considered; but wealthy owners and all
masters of labor should be mindful of this - that to exercise
pressure upon the indigent and the destitute for the sake of gain,
and to gather one's profit out of the need of another, is
condemned by all laws, human and divine. To defraud any one of
wages that are his due is a great crime which cries to the
avenging anger of Heaven. "Behold, the hire of the
laborers...which by fraud has been kept back by you, crieth; and
the cry of them hath entered into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth."(6)
Lastly, the rich must religiously refrain from cutting down the
workmen's earnings, whether by force, by fraud, or by usurious
dealing; and with all the greater reason because the laboring man
is, as a rule, weak and unprotected, and because his slender means
should in proportion to their scantiness be accounted sacred. Were
these precepts carefully obeyed and followed out, would they not
be sufficient of themselves to keep under all strife and all its
causes?
21.
But the Church, with Jesus Christ as her Master and Guide, aims
higher still. She lays down precepts yet more perfect, and tries
to bind class to class in friendliness and good feeling. The
things of earth cannot be understood or valued aright without
taking into consideration the life to come, the life that will
know no death. Exclude the idea of futurity, and forthwith the
very notion of what is good and right would perish; nay, the whole
scheme of the universe would become a dark and unfathomable
mystery. The great truth which we learn from nature herself is
also the grand Christian dogma on which religion rests as on its
foundation - that, when we have given up this present life, then
shall we really begin to live. God has not created us for the
perishable and transitory things of earth, but for things heavenly
and everlasting; He has given us this world as a place of exile,
and not as our abiding place. As for riches and the other things
which men call good and desirable, whether we have them in
abundance, or are lacking in them - so far as eternal happiness is
concerned - it makes no difference; the only important thing is to
use them aright. Jesus Christ, when He redeemed us with plentiful
redemption, took not away the pains and sorrows which in such
large proportion are woven together in the web of our mortal life.
He transformed them into motives of virtue and occasions of merit;
and no man can hope for eternal reward unless he follow in the
blood-stained footprints of his Savior. "If we suffer with
Him, we shall also reign with Him."(7) Christ's labors and
sufferings, accepted of His own free will, have marvelously
sweetened all suffering and all labor. And not only by His
example, but by His grace and by the hope held forth of
everlasting recompense, has He made pain and grief more easy to
endure; "for that which is at present momentary and light of
our tribulation, worketh for us above measure exceedingly an
eternal weight of glory."(8)
22.
Therefore, those whom fortune favors are warned that riches do not
bring freedom from sorrow and are of no avail for eternal
happiness, but rather are obstacles;(9) that the rich should
tremble at the threatenings of Jesus Christ - threatenings so
unwonted in the mouth of our Lord(10) - and that a most strict
account must be given to the Supreme Judge for all we possess. The
chief and most excellent rule for the right use of money is one
the heathen philosophers hinted at, but which the Church has
traced out clearly, and has not only made known to men's minds,
but has impressed upon their lives. It rests on the principle that
it is one thing to have a right to the possession of money and
another to have a right to use money as one wills. Private
ownership, as we have seen, is the natural right of man, and to
exercise that right, especially as members of society, is not only
lawful, but absolutely necessary. "It is lawful," says
St. Thomas Aquinas, "for a man to hold private property; and
it is also necessary for the carrying on of human existence."
But if the question be asked: How must one's possessions be used?
- the Church replies without hesitation in the words of the same
holy Doctor: "Man should not consider his material
possessions as his own, but as common to all, so as to share them
without hesitation when others are in need. Whence the Apostle
saith, 'Command the rich of this world...to offer with no stint,
to apportion largely.'"(12) True, no one is commanded to
distribute to others that which is required for his own needs and
those of his household; nor even to give away what is reasonably
required to keep up becomingly his condition in life, "for no
one ought to live other than becomingly."(13) But, when what
necessity demands has been supplied, and one's standing fairly
taken thought for, it becomes a duty to give to the indigent out
of what remains over. "Of that which remaineth, give
alms."(14) It is a duty, not of justice (save in extreme
cases), but of Christian charity - a duty not enforced by human
law. But the laws and judgments of men must yield place to the
laws and judgments of Christ the true God, who in many ways urges
on His followers the practice of almsgiving - "It is more
blessed to give than to receive";(15) and who will count a
kindness done or refused to the poor as done or refused to Himself
- "As long as you did it to one of My least brethren you did
it to Me."(16) To sum up, then, what has been said: Whoever
has received from the divine bounty a large share of temporal
blessings, whether they be external and material, or gifts of the
mind, has received them for the purpose of using them for the
perfecting of his own nature, and, at the same time, that he may
employ them, as the steward of God's providence, for the benefit
of others. "He that hath a talent," said St. Gregory the
Great, "let him see that he hide it not; he that hath
abundance, let him quicken himself to mercy and generosity; he
that hath art and skill, let him do his best to share the use and
the utility hereof with his neighbor."(17)
23.
As for those who possess not the gifts of fortune, they are taught
by the Church that in God's sight poverty is no disgrace, and that
there is nothing to be ashamed of in earning their bread by labor.
This is enforced by what we see in Christ Himself, who,
"whereas He was rich, for our sakes became poor";(18)
and who, being the Son of God, and God Himself, chose to seem and
to be considered the son of a carpenter - nay, did not disdain to
spend a great part of His life as a carpenter Himself. "Is
not this the carpenter, the son of Mary?"(19)
24.
From contemplation of this divine Model, it is more easy to
understand that the true worth and nobility of man lie in his
moral qualities, that is, in virtue; that virtue is, moreover, the
common inheritance of men, equally within the reach of high and
low, rich and poor; and that virtue, and virtue alone, wherever
found, will be followed by the rewards of everlasting happiness.
Nay, God Himself seems to incline rather to those who suffer
misfortune; for Jesus Christ calls the poor
"blessed";(20) He lovingly invites those in labor and
grief to come to Him for solace;(21) and He displays the tenderest
charity toward the lowly and the oppressed. These reflections
cannot fail to keep down the pride of the well-to-do, and to give
heart to the unfortunate; to move the former to be generous and
the latter to be moderate in their desires. Thus, the separation
which pride would set up tends to disappear, nor will it be
difficult to make rich and poor join hands in friendly concord.
25.
But, if Christian precepts prevail, the respective classes will
not only be united in the bonds of friendship, but also in those
of brotherly love. For they will understand and feel that all men
are children of the same common Father, who is God; that all have
alike the same last end, which is God Himself, who alone can make
either men or angels absolutely and perfectly happy; that each and
all are redeemed and made sons of God, by Jesus Christ, "the
first-born among many brethren"; that the blessings of nature
and the gifts of grace belong to the whole human race in common,
and that from none except the unworthy is withheld the inheritance
of the kingdom of Heaven. "If sons, heirs also; heirs indeed
of God, and co-heirs with Christ."(22) Such is the scheme of
duties and of rights which is shown forth to the world by the
Gospel. Would it not seem that, were society penetrated with ideas
like these, strife must quickly cease?
26.
But the Church, not content with pointing out the remedy, also
applies it. For the Church does her utmost to teach and to train
men, and to educate them and by the intermediary of her bishops
and clergy diffuses her salutary teachings far and wide. She
strives to influence the mind and the heart so that all may
willingly yield themselves to be formed and guided by the
commandments of God. It is precisely in this fundamental and
momentous matter, on which everything depends that the Church
possesses a power peculiarly her own. The instruments which she
employs are given to her by Jesus Christ Himself for the very
purpose of reaching the hearts of men, and drive their efficiency
from God. They alone can reach the innermost heart and conscience,
and bring men to act from a motive of duty, to control their
passions and appetites, to love God and their fellow men with a
love that is outstanding and of the highest degree and to break
down courageously every barrier which blocks the way to virtue.
27.
On this subject we need but recall for one moment the examples
recorded in history. Of these facts there cannot be any shadow of
doubt: for instance, that civil society was renovated in every
part by Christian institutions; that in the strength of that
renewal the human race was lifted up to better things - nay, that it
was brought back from death to life, and to so excellent a life
that nothing more perfect had been known before, or will come to
be known in the ages that have yet to be. Of this beneficent
transformation Jesus Christ was at once the first cause and the
final end; as from Him all came, so to Him was all to be brought
back. For, when the human race, by the light of the Gospel
message, came to know the grand mystery of the Incarnation of the
Word and the redemption of man, at once the life of Jesus Christ,
God and Man, pervaded every race and nation, and interpenetrated
them with His faith, His precepts, and His laws. And if human
society is to be healed now, in no other way can it be healed save
by a return to Christian life and Christian institutions. When a
society is perishing, the wholesome advice to give to those who
would restore it is to call it to the principles from which it
sprang; for the purpose and perfection of an association is to aim
at and to attain that for which it is formed, and its efforts
should be put in motion and inspired by the end and object which
originally gave it being. Hence, to fall away from its primal
constitution implies disease; to go back to it, recovery. And this
may be asserted with utmost truth both of the whole body of the
commonwealth and of that class of its citizens - by far the great
majority - who get their living by their labor.
28.
Neither must it be supposed that the solicitude of the Church is
so preoccupied with the spiritual concerns of her children as to
neglect their temporal and earthly interests. Her desire is that
the poor, for example, should rise above poverty and wretchedness,
and better their condition in life; and for this she makes a
strong endeavor. By the fact that she calls men to virtue and
forms them to its practice she promotes this in no slight degree.
Christian morality, when adequately and completely practiced,
leads of itself to temporal prosperity, for it merits the blessing
of that God who is the source of all blessings; it powerfully
restrains the greed of possession and the thirst for pleasure -
twin
plagues, which too often make a man who is void of self-restraint
miserable in the midst of abundance;(23) it makes men supply for
the lack of means through economy, teaching them to be content
with frugal living, and further, keeping them out of the reach of
those vices which devour not small incomes merely, but large
fortunes, and dissipate many a goodly inheritance.
29.
The Church, moreover, intervenes directly in behalf of the poor,
by setting on foot and maintaining many associations which she
knows to be efficient for the relief of poverty. Herein, again,
she has always succeeded so well as to have even extorted the
praise of her enemies. Such was the ardor of brotherly love among
the earliest Christians that numbers of those who were in better
circumstances despoiled themselves of their possessions in order
to relieve their brethren; whence "neither was there any one
needy among them."(24) To the order of deacons, instituted in
that very intent, was committed by the Apostles the charge of the
daily doles; and the Apostle Paul, though burdened with the
solicitude of all the churches, hesitated not to undertake
laborious journeys in order to carry the alms of the faithful to
the poorer Christians. Tertullian calls these contributions, given
voluntarily by Christians in their assemblies, deposits of piety,
because, to cite his own words, they were employed "in
feeding the needy, in burying them, in support of youths and
maidens destitute of means and deprived of their parents, in the
care of the aged, and the relief of the shipwrecked."(25)
30.
Thus, by degrees, came into existence the patrimony which the
Church has guarded with religious care as the inheritance of the
poor. Nay, in order to spare them the shame of begging, the Church
has provided aid for the needy. The common Mother of rich and poor
has aroused everywhere the heroism of charity, and has established
congregations of religious and many other useful institutions for
help and mercy, so that hardly any kind of suffering could exist
which was not afforded relief. At the present day many there are
who, like the heathen of old, seek to blame and condemn the Church
for such eminent charity. They would substitute in its stead a
system of relief organized by the State. But no human expedients
will ever make up for the devotedness and self-sacrifice of
Christian charity. Charity, as a virtue, pertains to the Church;
for virtue it is not, unless it be drawn from the Most Sacred
Heart of Jesus Christ; and whosoever turns his back on the Church
cannot be near to Christ.
31.
It cannot, however, be doubted that to attain the purpose we are
treating of, not only the Church, but all human agencies, must
concur. All who are concerned in the matter should be of one mind
and according to their ability act together. It is with this, as
with providence that governs the world; the results of causes do
not usually take place save where all the causes cooperate. It is
sufficient, therefore, to inquire what part the State should play
in the work of remedy and relief.
32.
By the State we here understand, not the particular form of
government prevailing in this or that nation, but the State as
rightly apprehended; that is to say, any government conformable in
its institutions to right reason and natural law, and to those
dictates of the divine wisdom which we have expounded in the
encyclical On the Christian Constitution of the State.(26) The
foremost duty, therefore, of the rulers of the State should be to
make sure that the laws and institutions, the general character
and administration of the commonwealth, shall be such as of
themselves to realize public well-being and private prosperity.
This is the proper scope of wise statesmanship and is the work of
the rulers. Now a State chiefly prospers and thrives through moral
rule, well-regulated family life, respect for religion and
justice, the moderation and fair imposing of public taxes, the
progress of the arts and of trade, the abundant yield of the land
- through everything, in fact, which makes the citizens better
and happier. Hereby, then, it lies in the power of a ruler to
benefit every class in the State, and amongst the rest to promote
to the utmost the interests of the poor; and this in virtue of his
office, and without being open to suspicion of undue interference
- since it is the province of the commonwealth to serve the common
good. And the more that is done for the benefit of the working
classes by the general laws of the country, the less need will
there be to seek for special means to relieve them.
33.
There is another and deeper consideration which must not be lost
sight of. As regards the State, the interests of all, whether high
or low, are equal. The members of the working classes are citizens
by nature and by the same right as the rich; they are real parts,
living the life which makes up, through the family, the body of
the commonwealth; and it need hardly be said that they are in
every city very largely in the majority. It would be irrational to
neglect one portion of the citizens and favor another, and
therefore the public administration must duly and solicitously
provide for the welfare and the comfort of the working classes;
otherwise, that law of justice will be violated which ordains that
each man shall have his due. To cite the wise words of St. Thomas
Aquinas: "As the part and the whole are in a certain sense
identical, so that which belongs to the whole in a sense belongs
to the part."(27) Among the many and grave duties of rulers
who would do their best for the people, the first and chief is to
act with strict justice - with that justice which is called
distributive - toward each and every class alike.
34.
But although all citizens, without exception, can and ought to
contribute to that common good in which individuals share so
advantageously to themselves, yet it should not be supposed that
all can contribute in the like way and to the same extent. No
matter what changes may occur in forms of government, there will
ever be differences and inequalities of condition in the State.
Society cannot exist or be conceived of without them. Some there
must be who devote themselves to the work of the commonwealth, who
make the laws or administer justice, or whose advice and authority
govern the nation in times of peace, and defend it in war. Such
men clearly occupy the foremost place in the State, and should be
held in highest estimation, for their work concerns most nearly
and effectively the general interests of the community. Those who
labor at a trade or calling do not promote the general welfare in
such measure as this, but they benefit the nation, if less
directly, in a most important manner. We have insisted, it is
true, that, since the end of society is to make men better, the
chief good that society can possess is virtue. Nevertheless, it is
the business of a well-constituted body politic to see to the
provision of those material and external helps "the use of
which is necessary to virtuous action."(28) Now, for the
provision of such commodities, the labor of the working class -
the exercise of their skill, and the employment of their strength,
in the cultivation of the land, and in the workshops of trade - is
especially responsible and quite indispensable. Indeed, their
cooperation is in this respect so important that it may be truly
said that it is only by the labor of working men that States grow
rich. Justice, therefore, demands that the interests of the
working classes should be carefully watched over by the
administration, so that they who contribute so largely to the
advantage of the community may themselves share in the benefits
which they create - that being housed, clothed, and bodily fit,
they may find their life less hard and more endurable. It follows
that whatever shall appear to prove conducive to the well-being of
those who work should obtain favorable consideration. There is no
fear that solicitude of this kind will be harmful to any interest;
on the contrary, it will be to the advantage of all, for it cannot
but be good for the commonwealth to shield from misery those on
whom it so largely depends for the things that it needs.
35.
We have said that the State must not absorb the individual or the
family; both should be allowed free and untrammeled action so far
as is consistent with the common good and the interest of others.
Rulers should, nevertheless, anxiously safeguard the community and
all its members; the community, because the conservation thereof
is so emphatically the business of the supreme power, that the
safety of the commonwealth is not only the first law, but it is a
government's whole reason of existence; and the members, because
both philosophy and the Gospel concur in laying down that the
object of the government of the State should be, not the advantage
of the ruler, but the benefit of those over whom he is placed. As
the power to rule comes from God, and is, as it were, a
participation in His, the highest of all sovereignties, it should
be exercised as the power of God is exercised - with a fatherly
solicitude which not only guides the whole, but reaches also
individuals.
36.
Whenever the general interest or any particular class suffers, or
is threatened with harm, which can in no other way be met or
prevented, the public authority must step in to deal with it. Now,
it is to the interest of the community, as well as of the
individual, that peace and good order should be maintained; that
all things should be carried on in accordance with God's laws and
those of nature; that the discipline of family life should be
observed and that religion should be obeyed; that a high standard
of morality should prevail, both in public and private life; that
justice should be held sacred and that no one should injure
another with impunity; that the members of the commonwealth should
grow up to man's estate strong and robust, and capable, if need
be, of guarding and defending their country. If by a strike of
workers or concerted interruption of work there should be imminent
danger of disturbance to the public peace; or if circumstances
were such as that among the working class the ties of family life
were relaxed; if religion were found to suffer through the workers
not having time and opportunity afforded them to practice its
duties; if in workshops and factories there were danger to morals
through the mixing of the sexes or from other harmful occasions of
evil; or if employers laid burdens upon their workmen which were
unjust, or degraded them with conditions repugnant to their
dignity as human beings; finally, if health were endangered by
excessive labor, or by work unsuited to sex or age - in such
cases, there can be no question but that, within certain limits,
it would be right to invoke the aid and authority of the law. The
limits must be determined by the nature of the occasion which
calls for the law's interference - the principle being that the
law must not undertake more, nor proceed further, than is required
for the remedy of the evil or the removal of the mischief.
37.
Rights must be religiously respected wherever they exist, and it
is the duty of the public authority to prevent and to punish
injury, and to protect everyone in the possession of his own.
Still, when there is question of defending the rights of
individuals, the poor and badly off have a claim to especial
consideration. The richer class have many ways of shielding
themselves, and stand less in need of help from the State; whereas
the mass of the poor have no resources of their own to fall back
upon, and must chiefly depend upon the assistance of the State.
And it is for this reason that wage-earners, since they mostly
belong in the mass of the needy, should be specially cared for and
protected by the government.
38.
Here, however, it is expedient to bring under special notice
certain matters of moment. First of all, there is the duty of
safeguarding private property by legal enactment and protection.
Most of all it is essential, where the passion of greed is so
strong, to keep the populace within the line of duty; for, if all
may justly strive to better their condition, neither justice nor
the common good allows any individual to seize upon that which
belongs to another, or, under the futile and shallow pretext of
equality, to lay violent hands on other people's possessions. Most
true it is that by far the larger part of the workers prefer to
better themselves by honest labor rather than by doing any wrong
to others. But there are not a few who are imbued with evil
principles and eager for revolutionary change, whose main purpose
is to stir up disorder and incite their fellows to acts of
violence. The authority of the law should intervene to put
restraint upon such firebrands, to save the working classes from
being led astray by their maneuvers, and to protect lawful owners
from spoliation.
39.
When work people have recourse to a strike and become voluntarily
idle, it is frequently because the hours of labor are too long, or
the work too hard, or because they consider their wages
insufficient. The grave inconvenience of this not uncommon
occurrence should be obviated by public remedial measures; for
such paralyzing of labor not only affects the masters and their
work people alike, but is extremely injurious to trade and to the
general interests of the public; moreover, on such occasions,
violence and disorder are generally not far distant, and thus it
frequently happens that the public peace is imperiled. The laws
should forestall and prevent such troubles from arising; they
should lend their influence and authority to the removal in good
time of the causes which lead to conflicts between employers and
employed.
40.
The working man, too, has interests in which he should be
protected by the State; and first of all, there are the interests
of his soul. Life on earth, however good and desirable in itself,
is not the final purpose for which man is created; it is only the
way and the means to that attainment of truth and that love of
goodness in which the full life of the soul consists. It is the
soul which is made after the image and likeness of God; it is in
the soul that the sovereignty resides in virtue whereof man is
commanded to rule the creatures below him and to use all the earth
and the ocean for his profit and advantage. "Fill the earth
and subdue it; and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls
of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the
earth."(29) In this respect all men are equal; there is here
no difference between rich and poor, master and servant, ruler and
ruled, "for the same is Lord over all."(30) No man may
with impunity outrage that human dignity which God Himself treats
with great reverence, nor stand in the way of that higher life
which is the preparation of the eternal life of heaven. Nay, more;
no man has in this matter power over himself. To consent to any
treatment which is calculated to defeat the end and purpose of his
being is beyond his right; he cannot give up his soul to
servitude, for it is not man's own rights which are here in
question, but the rights of God, the most sacred and inviolable of
rights.
41.
From this follows the obligation of the cessation from work and
labor on Sundays and certain holy days. The rest from labor is not
to be understood as mere giving way to idleness; much less must it
be an occasion for spending money and for vicious indulgence, as
many would have it to be; but it should be rest from labor,
hallowed by religion. Rest (combined with religious observances)
disposes man to forget for a while the business of his everyday
life, to turn his thoughts to things heavenly, and to the worship
which he so strictly owes to the eternal Godhead. It is this,
above all, which is the reason and motive of Sunday rest; a rest
sanctioned by God's great law of the Ancient Covenant - "Remember thou keep holy the Sabbath day,"(31)
and taught to the world by His own mysterious "rest"
after the creation of man: "He rested on the seventh day from
all His work which He had done."(32)
42.
If we turn not to things external and material, the first thing of
all to secure is to save unfortunate working people from the
cruelty of men of greed, who use human beings as mere instruments
for money-making. It is neither just nor human so to grind men
down with excessive labor as to stupefy their minds and wear out
their bodies. Man's powers, like his general nature, are limited,
and beyond these limits he cannot go. His strength is developed
and increased by use and exercise, but only on condition of due
intermission and proper rest. Daily labor, therefore, should be so
regulated as not to be protracted over longer hours than strength
admits. How many and how long the intervals of rest should be must
depend on the nature of the work, on circumstances of time and
place, and on the health and strength of the workman. Those who
work in mines and quarries, and extract coal, stone and metals
from the bowels of the earth, should have shorter hours in
proportion as their labor is more severe and trying to health.
Then, again, the season of the year should be taken into account;
for not infrequently a kind of labor is easy at one time which at
another is intolerable or exceedingly difficult. Finally, work
which is quite suitable for a strong man cannot rightly be
required from a woman or a child. And, in regard to children,
great care should be taken not to place them in workshops and
factories until their bodies and minds are sufficiently developed.
For, just as very rough weather destroys the buds of spring, so
does too early an experience of life's hard toil blight the young
promise of a child's faculties, and render any true education
impossible. Women, again, are not suited for certain occupations;
a woman is by nature fitted for home-work, and it is that which is
best adapted at once to preserve her modesty and to promote the
good bringing up of children and the well-being of the family. As
a general principle it may be laid down that a workman ought to
have leisure and rest proportionate to the wear and tear of his
strength, for waste of strength must be repaired by cessation from
hard work.
In
all agreements between masters and work people there is always the
condition expressed or understood that there should be allowed
proper rest for soul and body. To agree in any other sense would
be against what is right and just; for it can never be just or
right to require on the one side, or to promise on the other, the
giving up of those duties which a man owes to his God and to
himself.
43.
We now approach a subject of great importance, and one in respect
of which, if extremes are to be avoided, right notions are
absolutely necessary. Wages, as we are told, are regulated by free
consent, and therefore the employer, when he pays what was agreed
upon, has done his part and seemingly is not called upon to do
anything beyond. The only way, it is said, in which injustice
might occur would be if the master refused to pay the whole of the
wages, or if the workman should not complete the work undertaken;
in such cases the public authority should intervene, to see that
each obtains his due, but not under any other circumstances.
44.
To this kind of argument a fair-minded man will not easily or
entirely assent; it is not complete, for there are important
considerations which it leaves out of account altogether. To labor
is to exert oneself for the sake of procuring what is necessary
for the various purposes of life, and chief of all for
self-preservation. "In the sweat of thy face thou shalt eat
bread."(33) Hence, a man's labor necessarily bears two notes
or characters. First of all, it is personal, inasmuch as the force
which acts is bound up with the personality and is the exclusive
property of him who acts, and, further, was given to him for his
advantage. Secondly, man's labor is necessary; for without the
result of labor a man cannot live, and self-preservation is a law
of nature, which it is wrong to disobey. Now, were we to consider
labor merely in so far as it is personal, doubtless it would be
within the workman's right to accept any rate of wages whatsoever;
for in the same way as he is free to work or not, so is he free to
accept a small wage or even none at all. But our conclusion must
be very different if, together with the personal element in a
man's work, we consider the fact that work is also necessary for
him to live: these two aspects of his work are separable in
thought, but not in reality. The preservation of life is the
bounden duty of one and all, and to be wanting therein is a crime.
It necessarily follows that each one has a natural right to
procure what is required in order to live, and the poor can
procure that in no other way than by what they can earn through
their work.
45.
Let the working man and the employer make free agreements, and in
particular let them agree freely as to the wages; nevertheless,
there underlies a dictate of natural justice more imperious and
ancient than any bargain between man and man, namely, that wages
ought not to be insufficient to support a frugal and well-behaved
wage-earner. If through necessity or fear of a worse evil the
workman accept harder conditions because an employer or contractor
will afford him no better, he is made the victim of force and
injustice. In these and similar questions, however - such as, for
example, the hours of labor in different trades, the sanitary
precautions to be observed in factories and workshops, etc. - in
order to supersede undue interference on the part of the State,
especially as circumstances, times, and localities differ so
widely, it is advisable that recourse be had to societies or
boards such as We shall mention presently, or to some other mode
of safeguarding the interests of the wage-earners; the State being
appealed to, should circumstances require, for its sanction and
protection.
46.
If a workman's wages be sufficient to enable him comfortably to
support himself, his wife, and his children, he will find it easy,
if he be a sensible man, to practice thrift, and he will not fail,
by cutting down expenses, to put by some little savings and thus
secure a modest source of income. Nature itself would urge him to
this. We have seen that this great labor question cannot be solved
save by assuming as a principle that private ownership must be
held sacred and inviolable. The law, therefore, should favor
ownership, and its policy should be to induce as many of the
people as possible to become owners.
47.
Many excellent results will follow from this; and, first of all,
property will certainly become more equitably divided. For, the
result of civil change and revolution has been to divide cities
into two classes separated by a wide chasm. On the one side there
is the party which holds power because it holds wealth; which has
in its grasp the whole of labor and trade; which manipulates for
its own benefit and its own purposes all the sources of supply,
and which is not without influence even in the administration of
the commonwealth. On the other side there is the needy and
powerless multitude, sick and sore in spirit and ever ready for
disturbance. If working people can be encouraged to look forward
to obtaining a share in the land, the consequence will be that the
gulf between vast wealth and sheer poverty will be bridged over,
and the respective classes will be brought nearer to one another.
A further consequence will result in the great abundance of the
fruits of the earth. Men always work harder and more readily when
they work on that which belongs to them; nay, they learn to love
the very soil that yields in response to the labor of their hands,
not only food to eat, but an abundance of good things for
themselves and those that are dear to them. That such a spirit of
willing labor would add to the produce of the earth and to the
wealth of the community is self-evident. And a third advantage
would spring from this: men would cling to the country in which
they were born, for no one would exchange his country for a
foreign land if his own afforded him the means of living a decent
and happy life. These three important benefits, however, can be
reckoned on only provided that a man's means be not drained and
exhausted by excessive taxation. The right to possess private
property is derived from nature, not from man; and the State has
the right to control its use in the interests of the public good
alone, but by no means to absorb it altogether. The State would
therefore be unjust and cruel if under the name of taxation it
were to deprive the private owner of more than is fair.
48.
In the last place, employers and workmen may of themselves effect
much, in the matter We are treating, by means of such associations
and organizations as afford opportune aid to those who are in
distress, and which draw the two classes more closely together.
Among these may be enumerated societies for mutual help; various
benevolent foundations established by private persons to provide
for the workman, and for his widow or his orphans, in case of
sudden calamity, in sickness, and in the event of death; and
institutions for the welfare of boys and girls, young people, and
those more advanced in years.
49.
The most important of all are workingmen's unions, for these
virtually include all the rest. History attests what excellent
results were brought about by the artificers' guilds of olden
times. They were the means of affording not only many advantages
to the workmen, but in no small degree of promoting the
advancement of art, as numerous monuments remain to bear witness.
Such unions should be suited to the requirements of this our age -
an age of wider education, of different habits, and of far more
numerous requirements in daily life. It is gratifying to know that
there are actually in existence not a few associations of this
nature, consisting either of workmen alone, or of workmen and
employers together, but it were greatly to be desired that they
should become more numerous and more efficient. We have spoken of
them more than once, yet it will be well to explain here how
notably they are needed, to show that they exist of their own
right, and what should be their organization and their mode of
action.
50.
The consciousness of his own weakness urges man to call in aid
from without. We read in the pages of holy Writ: "It is
better that two should be together than one; for they have the
advantage of their society. If one fall he shall be supported by
the other. Woe to him that is alone, for when he falleth he hath
none to lift him up."(34) And further: "A brother that
is helped by his brother is like a strong city."(35) It is
this natural impulse which binds men together in civil society;
and it is likewise this which leads them to join together in
associations which are, it is true, lesser and not independent
societies, but, nevertheless, real societies.
51.
These lesser societies and the larger society differ in many
respects, because their immediate purpose and aim are different.
Civil society exists for the common good, and hence is concerned
with the interests of all in general, albeit with individual
interests also in their due place and degree. It is therefore
called a public society, because by its agency, as St. Thomas Aquinas says, "Men establish relations in common with one
another in the setting up of a commonwealth."(36) But
societies which are formed in the bosom of the commonwealth are
styled private, and rightly so, since their immediate purpose is
the private advantage of the associates. "Now, a private
society," says St. Thomas again, "is one which is formed
for the purpose of carrying out private objects; as when two or
three enter into partnership with the view of trading in
common."(37) Private societies, then, although they exist
within the body politic, and are severally part of the
commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such,
prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a
"society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and
the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to
destroy them; and, if it forbid its citizens to form associations,
it contradicts the very principle of its own existence, for both
they and it exist in virtue of the like principle, namely, the
natural tendency of man to dwell in society.
52.
There are occasions, doubtless, when it is fitting that the law
should intervene to prevent certain associations, as when men join
together for purposes which are evidently bad, unlawful, or
dangerous to the State. In such cases, public authority may justly
forbid the formation of such associations, and may dissolve them
if they already exist. But every precaution should be taken not to
violate the rights of individuals and not to impose unreasonable
regulations under pretense of public benefit. For laws only bind
when they are in accordance with right reason, and, hence, with
the eternal law of God.(38)
53.
And here we are reminded of the confraternities, societies, and
religious orders which have arisen by the Church's authority and
the piety of Christian men. The annals of every nation down to our
own days bear witness to what they have accomplished for the human
race. It is indisputable that on grounds of reason alone such
associations, being perfectly blameless in their objects, possess
the sanction of the law of nature. In their religious aspect they
claim rightly to be responsible to the Church alone. The rulers of
the State accordingly have no rights over them, nor can they claim
any share in their control; on the contrary, it is the duty of the
State to respect and cherish them, and, if need be, to defend them
from attack. It is notorious that a very different course has been
followed, more especially in our own times. In many places the
State authorities have laid violent hands on these communities,
and committed manifold injustice against them; it has placed them
under control of the civil law, taken away their rights as
corporate bodies, and despoiled them of their property, in such
property the Church had her rights, each member of the body had
his or her rights, and there were also the rights of those who had
founded or endowed these communities for a definite purpose, and,
furthermore, of those for whose benefit and assistance they had
their being. Therefore We cannot refrain from complaining of such
spoliation as unjust and fraught with evil results; and with all
the more reason do We complain because, at the very time when the
law proclaims that association is free to all, We see that
Catholic societies, however peaceful and useful, are hampered in
every way, whereas the utmost liberty is conceded to individuals
whose purposes are at once hurtful to religion and dangerous to
the commonwealth.
54.
Associations of every kind, and especially those of working men,
are now far more common than heretofore. As regards many of these
there is no need at present to inquire whence they spring, what
are their objects, or what the means they imply. Now, there is a
good deal of evidence in favor of the opinion that many of these
societies are in the hands of secret leaders, and are managed on
principles ill-according with Christianity and the public
well-being; and that they do their utmost to get within their
grasp the whole field of labor, and force working men either to
join them or to starve. Under these circumstances Christian
working men must do one of two things: either join associations in
which their religion will be exposed to peril, or form
associations among themselves and unite their forces so as to
shake off courageously the yoke of so unrighteous and intolerable
an oppression. No one who does not wish to expose man's chief good
to extreme risk will for a moment hesitate to say that the second
alternative should by all means be adopted.
55.
Those Catholics are worthy of all praise - and they are not a few
- who, understanding what the times require, have striven, by
various undertakings and endeavors, to better the condition of the
working class by rightful means. They have taken up the cause of
the working man, and have spared no efforts to better the
condition both of families and individuals; to infuse a spirit of
equity into the mutual relations of employers and employed; to
keep before the eyes of both classes the precepts of duty and the
laws of the Gospel - that Gospel which, by inculcating
self-restraint, keeps men within the bounds of moderation, and
tends to establish harmony among the divergent interests and the
various classes which compose the body politic. It is with such
ends in view that we see men of eminence, meeting together for
discussion, for the promotion of concerted action, and for
practical work. Others, again, strive to unite working men of
various grades into associations, help them with their advice and
means, and enable them to obtain fitting and profitable
employment. The bishops, on their part, bestow their ready good
will and support; and with their approval and guidance many
members of the clergy, both secular and regular, labor assiduously
in behalf of the spiritual interest of the members of such
associations. And there are not wanting Catholics blessed with
affluence, who have, as it were, cast in their lot with the
wage-earners, and who have spent large sums in founding and widely
spreading benefit and insurance societies, by means of which the
working man may without difficulty acquire through his labor not
only many present advantages, but also the certainty of honorable
support in days to come. How greatly such manifold and earnest
activity has benefited the community at large is too well known to
require Us to dwell upon it. We find therein grounds for most
cheering hope in the future, provided always that the associations
We have described continue to grow and spread, and are well and
wisely administered. The State should watch over these societies
of citizens banded together in accordance with their rights, but
it should not thrust itself into their peculiar concerns and their
organization, for things move and live by the spirit inspiring
them, and may be killed by the rough grasp of a hand from without.
56.
In order that an association may be carried on with unity of
purpose and harmony of action, its administration and government
should be firm and wise. All such societies, being free to exist,
have the further right to adopt such rules and organization as may
best conduce to the attainment of their respective objects. We do
not judge it possible to enter into minute particulars touching
the subject of organization; this must depend on national
character, on practice and experience, on the nature and aim of
the work to be done, on the scope of the various trades and
employments, and on other circumstances of fact and of time - all
of which should be carefully considered.
57.
To sum up, then, We may lay it down as a general and lasting law
that working men's associations should be so organized and
governed as to furnish the best and most suitable means for
attaining what is aimed at, that is to say, for helping each
individual member to better his condition to the utmost in body,
soul, and property. It is clear that they must pay special and
chief attention to the duties of religion and morality, and that
social betterment should have this chiefly in view; otherwise they
would lose wholly their special character, and end by becoming
little better than those societies which take no account whatever
of religion. What advantage can it be to a working man to obtain
by means of a society material well-being, if he endangers his
soul for lack of spiritual food? "What doth it profit a man,
if he gain the whole world and suffer the loss of his
soul?"(39) This, as our Lord teaches, is the mark or character
that distinguishes the Christian from the heathen. "After all
these things do the heathen seek...Seek ye first the Kingdom of
God and His justice: and all these things shall be added unto
you."(40) Let our associations, then, look first and before
all things to God; let religious instruction have therein the
foremost place, each one being carefully taught what is his duty
to God, what he has to believe, what to hope for, and how he is to
work out his salvation; and let all be warned and strengthened
with special care against wrong principles and false teaching. Let
the working man be urged and led to the worship of God, to the
earnest practice of religion, and, among other things, to the
keeping holy of Sundays and holy days. Let him learn to reverence
and love holy Church, the common Mother of us all; and hence to
obey the precepts of the Church, and to frequent the sacraments,
since they are the means ordained by God for obtaining forgiveness
of sin and for leading a holy life.
58.
The foundations of the organization being thus laid in religion,
We next proceed to make clear the relations of the members one to
another, in order that they may live together in concord and go
forward prosperously and with good results. The offices and
charges of the society should be apportioned for the good of the
society itself, and in such mode that difference in degree or
standing should not interfere with unanimity and goodwill. It is
most important that office bearers be appointed with due prudence
and discretion, and each one's charge be carefully mapped out, in
order that no members may suffer harm. The common funds must be
administered with strict honesty, in such a way that a member may
receive assistance in proportion to his necessities. The rights
and duties of the employers, as compared with the rights and
duties of the employed, ought to be the subject of careful
consideration. Should it happen that either a master or a workman
believes himself injured, nothing would be more desirable than
that a committee should be appointed, composed of reliable and
capable members of the association, whose duty would be,
conformably with the rules of the association, to settle the
dispute. Among the several purposes of a society, one should be to
try to arrange for a continuous supply of work at all times and
seasons; as well as to create a fund out of which the members may
be effectually helped in their needs, not only in the cases of
accident, but also in sickness, old age, and distress.
59.
Such rules and regulations, if willingly obeyed by all, will
sufficiently ensure the well-being of the less well-to-do; whilst
such mutual associations among Catholics are certain to be
productive in no small degree of prosperity to the State. Is it
not rash to conjecture the future from the past. Age gives way to
age, but the events of one century are wonderfully like those of
another, for they are directed by the providence of God, who
overrules the course of history in accordance with His purposes in
creating the race of man. We are told that it was cast as a
reproach on the Christians in the early ages of the Church that
the greater number among them had to live by begging or by labor.
Yet, destitute though they were of wealth and influence, they
ended by winning over to their side the favor of the rich and the
goodwill of the powerful. They showed themselves industrious,
hard-working, assiduous, and peaceful, ruled by justice, and,
above all, bound together in brotherly love. In presence of such
mode of life and such example, prejudice gave way, the tongue of
malevolence was silenced, and the lying legends of ancient
superstition little by little yielded to Christian truth.
60.
At the time being, the condition of the working classes is the
pressing question of the hour, and nothing can be of higher
interest to all classes of the State than that it should be
rightly and reasonably settled. But it will be easy for Christian
working men to solve it aright if they will form associations,
choose wise guides, and follow on the path which with so much
advantage to themselves and the commonweal was trodden by their
fathers before them. Prejudice, it is true, is mighty, and so is
the greed of money; but if the sense of what is just and rightful
be not deliberately stifled, their fellow citizens are sure to be
won over to a kindly feeling towards men whom they see to be in
earnest as regards their work and who prefer so unmistakably right dealing
to mere lucre, and the sacredness of duty to every other
consideration.
61.
And further great advantage would result from the state of things
We are describing; there would exist so much more ground for hope,
and likelihood, even, of recalling to a sense of their duty those
working men who have either given up their faith altogether, or
whose lives are at variance with its precepts. Such men feel in
most cases that they have been fooled by empty promises and
deceived by false pretexts. They cannot but perceive that their
grasping employers too often treat them with great inhumanity and
hardly care for them outside the profit their labor brings; and if
they belong to any union, it is probably one in which there
exists, instead of charity and love, that intestine strife which
ever accompanies poverty when unresigned and unsustained by
religion. Broken in spirit and worn down in body, how many of them
would gladly free themselves from such galling bondage! But human
respect, or the dread of starvation, makes them tremble to take
the step. To such as these Catholic associations are of
incalculable service, by helping them out of their difficulties,
inviting them to companionship and receiving the returning
wanderers to a haven where they may securely find repose.
62.
We have now laid before you, venerable brethren, both who are the
persons and what are the means whereby this most arduous question
must be solved. Everyone should put his hand to the work which
falls to his share, and that at once and straightway, lest the
evil which is already so great become through delay absolutely
beyond remedy. Those who rule the commonwealths should avail
themselves of the laws and institutions of the country; masters
and wealthy owners must be mindful of their duty; the working
class, whose interests are at stake, should make every lawful and
proper effort; and since religion alone, as We said at the
beginning, can avail to destroy the evil at its root, all men
should rest persuaded that the main thing needful is to re-establish
Christian morals, apart from which all the plans and devices of
the wisest will prove of little avail.
63.
In regard to the Church, her cooperation will never be found
lacking, be the time or the occasion what it may; and she will
intervene with all the greater effect in proportion as her liberty
of action is the more unfettered. Let this be carefully taken to
heart by those whose office it is to safeguard the public welfare.
Every minister of holy religion must bring to the struggle the
full energy of his mind and all his power of endurance. Moved by
your authority, venerable brethren, and quickened by your example,
they should never cease to urge upon men of every class, upon the
high-placed as well as the lowly, the Gospel doctrines of
Christian life; by every means in their power they must strive to
secure the good of the people; and above all must earnestly
cherish in themselves, and try to arouse in others, charity, the
mistress and the queen of virtues. For, the happy results we all
long for must be chiefly brought about by the plenteous outpouring
of charity; of that true Christian charity which is the fulfilling
of the whole Gospel law, which is always ready to sacrifice itself
for others' sake, and is man's surest antidote against worldly
pride and immoderate love of self; that charity whose office is
described and whose Godlike features are outlined by the Apostle
St. Paul in these words: "Charity is patient, is kind,...seeketh
not her own,...suffereth all things,...endureth all
things."(41)
64.
On each of you, venerable brethren, and on your clergy and people,
as an earnest of God's mercy and a mark of Our affection, we
lovingly in the Lord bestow the apostolic benediction.
Given
at St. Peter's in Rome, the fifteenth day of May, 1891, the
fourteenth year of Our pontificate.
Endnotes:
1.
Thus the title sometimes given to this encyclical, 'On the Condition of
the Working Classes'. | 2.
Deut. 5:21 | 3. Gen. 1:28 | 4. Summa Theologiae, IIa-IIae, q. x,
art. 12, Answer | 5. Gen. 3:17 | 6. Jms. 5:4 | 7. 2 Tim. 2:12 | 8.
2 Cor. 4:17 | 9. Mt. 19:23-24 | 10. Lk. 6:24-5 | 11. Summa Theologiae, IIa-IIae, q. lxvi, art. 2, Answer | 12. Ibid. | 13.
Ibid., q. xxxii, a. 6, Answer | 14. Lk. 11:41 | 15. Acts 20:35 |
16. Mt. 25:40 | 17. Hom. in Evang., 9, n. 7 (PL 76, 1109B) | 18. 2
Cor. 8:9 | 19. Mk. 6:3 | 20. Mt. 5:3 | 21. Mt. 11:28 | 22. Rom.
8:17 | 23. 1 Tim. 6:10 | 24. Acts 4:34 | 25. Apologia secunda, 39,
(Apologeticus, cap. 39; PL1, 533A) | 26. See above, pp. 161-184 |
27. Summa Theologiae, IIa-IIae, q. lxi, art. l, ad 2m | 28. Thomas
Aquinas, On the Governance of Rulers, 1, 15 (Opera omnia, ed.
Vives, Vol. 27, p. 356) | 29. Gen. 1:28 | 30. Rom. 10:12 | 31. Ex.
20:8 | 32. Gen. 2:2 | 33. Gen. 3:19 | 34. Eccl. 4:9-10 | 35. Prov.
18:19 | 36. Contra impugnantes Dei cultum et religionem, Part 2,
ch. 8 (Opera omnia, ed. Vives, Vol. 29, p. 16) | 37. Ibid. | 38.
"Human law is law only by virtue of its accordance with right
reason; and thus it is manifest that it flows from the eternal
law. And in so far as it deviates from right reason it is called
an unjust law; in such case it is no law at all, but rather a
species of violence." Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Ia-IIae, q. xciii, art. 3, ad 2m | 39. Mt. 16:26 | 40. Mt. 6:32-33
| 41. 1 Cor. 13:4-7
The above is provided for informational purposes only and may not be comprehensive. By using this site you agree to all terms. For terms
information, see "Important Notice" above and click
here.
|