We certainly
understand both the confusion and your concerns. Unfortunately there is so much
confusion in the Church today and it really is necessary for the faithful to be
very careful concerning what is true Catholic doctrine.
To answer your
questions, I think the best way I can put things is that yes, the Church may (at
present) allow persons to receive the Holy Eucharist standing - and even from a
lay person (in areas where this is allowed). However, both are very problematic
and both are conditional (for example Redemptionis Sacramentum states: "if they
receive Communion standing, it is recommended that they give due reverence
before the reception of the Sacrament" and "Only when there is a necessity may
extraordinary ministers assist the Priest celebrant in accordance with the norm
of law"). Despite these conditions, few people actually give 'due reverence'
(ever notice how so many persons bow to the rear end of the person in front of
them in order to speed things up rather than 'slow down the line' by actually
waiting to at least bow to the Holy Eucharist?) and many parishes use
'extraordinary ministers' every week regardless of any supposed necessity. Note
also that the use of 'extraordinary ministers' is now only tolerated due to
disobedience. The Church has long condemned the use of lay persons handling the
Holy Eucharist (see
here). Furthermore, both practices may lead to loss of faith in the Real
Presence of Christ in the Holy
Eucharist – and also they may lead to sacrilege. (You have only to look around
you to see the truth of these statements, correct?) Both are obviously very
serious problems today. This is simply a matter of common sense that even
atheists could understand if it was explained to them.
Finally,
note that these practices may be allowed/tolerated (at least at
Novus Ordo Masses), but they are certainly not desirable. Common sense alone
tells these practices can harm souls (for example, consider the dangers to souls
over loss of faith in the Real Presence – see 1 Cor. 11:29) and are not as
respectful [consider that "at the name of Jesus every knee should bend" (Phil.
2:10) and that even those who mocked Christ during the Passion knelt (see Mt.
27:29)]. As kneeling goes, the best I can tell you is that you should absolutely
feel comfortable receiving Holy Communion kneeling. This is certainly the
desired posture for those physically able. While some of the more liberal
bishops may discourage it (we know of one case where a bishop actually pulled a
woman up off her knees), other bishops have prohibited standing. Popes have
certainly encouraged kneeling (and NOT standing) and also have protected the
laity's right to kneel (for example, Redemptionis Sacramentum states:
"Therefore, it is not licit to deny Holy Communion to any of Christ's faithful
solely on the grounds, for example, that the person wishes to receive the
Eucharist kneeling or standing"). When standing is allowed, it can be a matter
for one's conscience. Kneeling, however, is a right of ours protected by the
Church – as is taking Communion on the tongue. You should most definitely *not*
feel forced to go against your conscience & be less respectful to the Holy
Eucharist (you say yourself that you "feel uncomfortable receiving the Holy of
Holies in my hand and standing up"). Whether or not kneeling for Christ happens
to 'draw attention to yourself' is really irrelevant. Doing the right thing is
not a popularity contest. We understand that your pastor may not want you to
kneel, but it is nevertheless your right. If desired, you could remind him of
your right and refer him to the document Redemptionis Sacramentum on the Vatican
website. Again, this document states that "it is not licit to deny Holy
Communion to any of Christ's faithful solely on the grounds, for example, that
the person wishes to receive the Eucharist kneeling or standing." For more on
kneeling, please visit
here.
From your message, you
seem clearly to be a devout Catholic who wants to follow the Church's teachings.
It appears to me that you are on the right track on these issues, but you are
cautious over lack of support by your pastor. This can be a difficult situation,
but I can assure you I personally know holy priests who are in good standing in
the Church who would most definitely agree with the position that Holy Communion
should only be received kneeling (if physically able), on the tongue, and from a
priest. Even though we're in liberal California, there are two diocesan parishes I know
of here that have & use an altar rail. I also know a priest who refused for his
entire life to give out Communion in the hand. He always remained in good
standing in the Church and was a very holy priest (unfortunately he died a few
years ago). Another holy priest we know considers today's popular manner of
receiving Holy Communion to be a personal cross. Furthermore, the Popes
typically require Holy Communion to be received while kneeling. So, know that
you are not alone, even if you unfortunately face some opposition in your area.
Nevertheless, you are perfectly within your rights (and not only that, but are
you are perfectly right!) to receive Holy Communion kneeling, on the tongue, and
from a priest. Don't be discouraged even if you do not have the support you
really should have. Perhaps your good example will affect others and you may
later receive more support. If not, perhaps you could thank Christ for being
allowed a share of His suffering. I am quite confident that persons who lovingly
reverence the Eucharist by kneeling will find no trouble for this at their
judgment (even, perhaps, a reward), even if they do experience trouble on earth.
Regarding taking Holy
Communion to the sick, this might be something you want to reflect on. Consider
this quote...
"It is written
(De Consecratione, distinction 12): 'It has come to our knowledge that some
priests deliver the Lord's body to a layman or to a woman to carry it to the
sick: The synod therefore forbids such presumption to continue; and let the
priest himself communicate the sick.'" (St. Thomas Aquinas, Doctor of the Church
and "greatest theologian in the history of the Church").
As further 'food for
thought', you might consider the material
here.
Please do not take any
offense whatsoever at what is said – I have every confidence that you have
nothing but good intentions in doing so and I assure you I have no intention
whatsoever to offer any offense or cause you any distress whatsoever by
referring you here. We do know of at least one person who used to be an
'extraordinary minister' who has since given up the practice & condemns it after
he spent some time reflecting on it. We have also seen experiments
done concerning the number Sacred Particles that are left behind when lay
persons handle the Holy Eucharist – and I'm sure I don't have to tell you that
each particle, no matter how small, is truly Christ's flesh & blood. It's
heartbreaking to realize that churches & hospitals may be literally lined with
Sacred Particles that are being trampled on.
Finally, you may be
interested to know that novelties such as Communion in the Hand, 'Lay
Ministers', standing for Communion, etc. can (typically) be avoided by attending
the highly reverent Traditional Latin Mass (see
here for more information).
Did you know? It is still possible – thanks be to
God! – to lawfully attend the Traditional Latin Mass. The Traditional Latin
('Tridentine') Mass differs from the 1960's Novus Ordo Mass in many &
significant ways (try
here for more information). To locate a Traditional Latin Mass in your area,
try
here.
+ + +
"It must
be taught, then, that to priests alone has been given power to consecrate and
administer to the faithful, the Holy Eucharist. That this has been the unvarying
practice of the Church, that the faithful should receive the Sacrament from the
priests, and that the officiating priests should communicate themselves, has
been explained by the holy Council of Trent, which has also shown that this
practice, as having proceeded from Apostolic tradition, is to be religiously
retained, particularly as Christ the Lord has left us an illustrious example
thereof, having consecrated His own most sacred body, and given it to the
Apostles with His own hands." (Catechism of the Council of Trent)
Reminder: We make no guarantee whatsoever regarding any item herein. Items herein may be the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect our views.
All applicable items may be subject to change at any time without notice. Utilize any link(s) appearing on this page at your own risk.
For more terms information, see "Important Notice" below.
|