As stated in the
Baltimore Catechism...
"We should
assist at Mass with great interior recollection and piety, and with every
outward mark of respect and devotion."
It should be noted
that the word "assist" does NOT mean the faithful have any role in
effecting the Sacrament. It is the priest alone – acting in the place of
Christ – who effects the transubstantiation, and no lay persons (or
'spectators') are necessary...
"The proposition
of the synod in which, after it states that 'a partaking of the victim [that is,
Christ in the Holy Eucharist] is an essential part in the sacrifice,' it adds,
'nevertheless, it does not condemn as illicit those Masses in which those
present do not communicate sacramentally, for the reason that they do partake of
the victim, although less perfectly, by receiving it spiritually,' since it
insinuates that there is something lacking to the essence of the sacrifice [of
the Mass] in that sacrifice which is performed either with no one present, or
with those present who partake of the victim neither sacramentally nor
spiritually, and as if those Masses should be condemned as illicit, in which,
with the priest alone communicating, no one is present who communicates either
sacramentally or spiritually, [is condemned as] false, erroneous, suspected of
heresy and savoring of it." ('Auctorem fidei', Condemning the Errors of the
Synod of Pistoia, Aug. 28, 1794 A.D., emphasis added)
"[A]s all know,
the integrity of the [Eucharistic] Sacrifice only requires that the priest
partake of the heavenly food. Although it is most desirable that the people
should also approach the holy table, this is not required for the integrity of
the [Eucharistic] Sacrifice... They, therefore, err from the path of truth who
do not want to have Masses celebrated unless the faithful communicate; and those
are still more in error who, in holding that it is altogether necessary for the
faithful to receive Holy Communion as well as the priest, put forward the
captious argument that here there is question not of a [Eucharistic] sacrifice
merely, but of a sacrifice and a supper of brotherly union, and consider the
general communion of all present as the culminating point of the whole
celebration. Now it cannot be over-emphasized that the Eucharistic Sacrifice of
its very nature is the unbloody immolation of the divine Victim [Christ], which
is made manifest in a mystical manner by the separation of the sacred species
and by their oblation to the eternal Father. Holy Communion pertains to the
integrity of the Mass and to the partaking of the august Sacrament; but while it
is obligatory for the priest who says the Mass, it is only something earnestly
recommended to the faithful." (Pope Pius XII, "Mediator Dei", 1947 A.D.)
In fact, the laity
should not perform any actions proper to a priest...
"Can. 907 In
the celebration of the Eucharist [the Mass], deacons and lay persons are not
permitted to say the prayers, especially the eucharistic prayer, nor to perform
the actions which are proper to the celebrating priest." (1983 Code of Canon
Law)
Final Note: It has
been widely demonstrated that the
Novus Ordo Mass of the 1960's can make it
difficult for Catholics to assist properly at Mass (e.g. due to noise, abuses,
etc.). Thankfully, the
Traditional Latin Mass is still lawfully
said throughout the world. This ancient & incomparable, highly reverent Mass
contains numerous & significant
differences from the 1960's Novus Ordo Mass (try
here for more information). To locate a Traditional Latin Mass in your area,
try
here.
Reminder: We make no guarantee whatsoever regarding any item herein. Items herein may be the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect our views.
All applicable items may be subject to change at any time without notice. Utilize any link(s) appearing on this page at your own risk.
For more terms information, see "Important Notice" below.
|