| 
 There are many 
harms / dangers / concerns regarding 'lay ministers of Holy Communion' (more 
properly called 'extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist'). For example... 
(1) The practice began in the 20th century as a result of 
disobedience to the Pope 
(2) Their use has contributed to irreverence, loss of 
faith, confusion of the priestly role, desecration, and sacrilege and is a 
radical break with Catholic tradition which coincides with Protestant 
sensibilities 
(3) The Church has always prohibited lay persons from 
touching the Sacred Species... 
"To touch the 
sacred species and to distribute them with their own hands is a privilege of the 
ordained" (Pope John Paul II, 1980 A.D.) 
"[L]aymen are 
officially incompetent to dispense any sacrament: and that they can baptize in 
cases of necessity, is due to the Divine dispensation, in order that no one may 
be deprived of spiritual regeneration." (St. Thomas Aquinas, Doctor of the 
Church and "greatest theologian in the history of the Church") 
"There is 
nothing which belongs more to the Church and there is nothing Jesus Christ 
wanted more closely reserved for its shepherds than the dispensation of the 
sacraments He instituted." (Pope Gregory XVI, "Commissum Divinitus", 1835 A.D.)  
"It must be 
taught, then, that to priests alone has been given power to consecrate and 
administer to the faithful, the Holy Eucharist. That this has been the unvarying 
practice of the Church, that the faithful should receive the Sacrament from the 
priests, and that the officiating priests should communicate themselves, has 
been explained by the holy Council of Trent, which has also shown that this 
practice, as having proceeded from Apostolic tradition, is to be religiously 
retained, particularly as Christ the Lord has left us an illustrious example 
thereof, having consecrated His own most sacred body, and given it to the 
Apostles with His own hands." (Catechism of the Council of Trent) 
(4) This practice leads to additional handling of the Holy 
Eucharist (two additional people may now touch It - the lay 'minister' and the 
communicant) and therefore there is greater danger of spillage, profanation, and 
sacrilege 
(5) This practice has lessened respect for the Holy 
Eucharist 
(6) This practice diminishes respect for the priesthood by 
placing lay persons on the same level as priests with respect to distribution of 
the Holy Eucharist 
(7) This practice leads to loss of faith in the
Real Presence 
(8) This practice reduces reverence and creates 
distractions, and is especially scandalous given the poor behavior, immodest 
dress & bad example of some 'extraordinary ministers' 
(9) This practice leads to the deplorable situation of Holy 
Communion being taken to the sick by lay persons - thereby depriving the sick of 
the presence of the priest & the other sacraments in their critical hour of need 
- possibly leading to the loss of eternal souls!... 
In addition to 
the many dangers of allowing lay persons to handle the Blessed Sacrament 
(including abuse & profanation of the Sacrament, blurring the distinction 
between priest and laity, etc.), there are special dangers in allowing lay 
persons to distribute Holy Communion to the sick. In fact, the practice may 
actually endanger the salvation of the sick person. Sadly, this practice occurs 
at a time when the person is most vulnerable and most in need of (and possibly 
most receptive to) a priest. Not only does the sick person encounter a lay 
person (that they might not even know) daring to handle Holy Communion, but his 
(or her) presence there serves to deprive him of the comfort of the priest and 
may lead his mind to various negative thoughts (e.g. "I'm not important enough 
for the priest", "the priest doesn't have time for me", etc.). Also, if lay 
persons bring the Blessed Sacrament, how can anyone ever be certain it is 
actually the Eucharist? Anyone - for whatever reason - could bring a wafer of 
bread and act as if it was the true Eucharist. Clearly, the priest alone is the 
most likely person to ensure the Sacrament is the true Eucharist. Further, the 
lay person's administration of Holy Communion may also make it difficult for the 
sick person to distinguish the Real Presence ("since it is given by a lay 
person, how can I be sure it is really the Blessed Sacrament"?) - and thereby 
the sick person may make a sacrilegious Communion, leading to his damnation... 
"For anyone who 
eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on 
himself. That is why many among you are ill and infirm, and a considerable 
number are dying." (St. Paul, 1 Cor. 11:29-30) 
And if that 
wasn't bad enough, it should be noted that the sick person who is "passed off to 
a lay person" may be deprived of the other sacraments (e.g.
Anointing,
Penance) - which may be validly received only from the hands of a priest - 
when they are most necessary to his salvation.  
"It is 
written (De Consecratione, distinction 12): 'It has come to our knowledge that 
some priests deliver the Lord's body to a layman or to a woman to carry it to 
the sick: The synod therefore forbids such presumption to continue; and let the 
priest himself communicate the sick.'" (St. Thomas Aquinas, Doctor of the Church 
and "greatest theologian in the history of the Church") 
Etc. 
Did you know? Those wishing to avoid harmful 
post-Vatican II novelties (including 'lay ministers' handling the Blessed 
Sacrament) may, thanks be to God, still lawfully attend the
Traditional Latin Mass. The Traditional Latin ('Tridentine') Mass differs 
from the 1960's
Novus Ordo Mass in many & significant ways (try
here for more information). To locate a Traditional Latin Mass in your area, 
try
here. 
 
Reminder: We make no guarantee whatsoever regarding any item herein. Items herein may be the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect our views. 
All applicable items may be subject to change at any time without notice. Utilize any link(s) appearing on this page at your own risk.  
For more terms information, see "Important Notice" below. 
 |