There are many
harms / dangers / concerns regarding 'lay ministers of Holy Communion' (more
properly called 'extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist'). For example...
(1) The practice began in the 20th century as a result of
disobedience to the Pope
(2) Their use has contributed to irreverence, loss of
faith, confusion of the priestly role, desecration, and sacrilege and is a
radical break with Catholic tradition which coincides with Protestant
sensibilities
(3) The Church has always prohibited lay persons from
touching the Sacred Species...
"To touch the
sacred species and to distribute them with their own hands is a privilege of the
ordained" (Pope John Paul II, 1980 A.D.)
"[L]aymen are
officially incompetent to dispense any sacrament: and that they can baptize in
cases of necessity, is due to the Divine dispensation, in order that no one may
be deprived of spiritual regeneration." (St. Thomas Aquinas, Doctor of the
Church and "greatest theologian in the history of the Church")
"There is
nothing which belongs more to the Church and there is nothing Jesus Christ
wanted more closely reserved for its shepherds than the dispensation of the
sacraments He instituted." (Pope Gregory XVI, "Commissum Divinitus", 1835 A.D.)
"It must be
taught, then, that to priests alone has been given power to consecrate and
administer to the faithful, the Holy Eucharist. That this has been the unvarying
practice of the Church, that the faithful should receive the Sacrament from the
priests, and that the officiating priests should communicate themselves, has
been explained by the holy Council of Trent, which has also shown that this
practice, as having proceeded from Apostolic tradition, is to be religiously
retained, particularly as Christ the Lord has left us an illustrious example
thereof, having consecrated His own most sacred body, and given it to the
Apostles with His own hands." (Catechism of the Council of Trent)
(4) This practice leads to additional handling of the Holy
Eucharist (two additional people may now touch It - the lay 'minister' and the
communicant) and therefore there is greater danger of spillage, profanation, and
sacrilege
(5) This practice has lessened respect for the Holy
Eucharist
(6) This practice diminishes respect for the priesthood by
placing lay persons on the same level as priests with respect to distribution of
the Holy Eucharist
(7) This practice leads to loss of faith in the
Real Presence
(8) This practice reduces reverence and creates
distractions, and is especially scandalous given the poor behavior, immodest
dress & bad example of some 'extraordinary ministers'
(9) This practice leads to the deplorable situation of Holy
Communion being taken to the sick by lay persons - thereby depriving the sick of
the presence of the priest & the other sacraments in their critical hour of need
- possibly leading to the loss of eternal souls!...
In addition to
the many dangers of allowing lay persons to handle the Blessed Sacrament
(including abuse & profanation of the Sacrament, blurring the distinction
between priest and laity, etc.), there are special dangers in allowing lay
persons to distribute Holy Communion to the sick. In fact, the practice may
actually endanger the salvation of the sick person. Sadly, this practice occurs
at a time when the person is most vulnerable and most in need of (and possibly
most receptive to) a priest. Not only does the sick person encounter a lay
person (that they might not even know) daring to handle Holy Communion, but his
(or her) presence there serves to deprive him of the comfort of the priest and
may lead his mind to various negative thoughts (e.g. "I'm not important enough
for the priest", "the priest doesn't have time for me", etc.). Also, if lay
persons bring the Blessed Sacrament, how can anyone ever be certain it is
actually the Eucharist? Anyone - for whatever reason - could bring a wafer of
bread and act as if it was the true Eucharist. Clearly, the priest alone is the
most likely person to ensure the Sacrament is the true Eucharist. Further, the
lay person's administration of Holy Communion may also make it difficult for the
sick person to distinguish the Real Presence ("since it is given by a lay
person, how can I be sure it is really the Blessed Sacrament"?) - and thereby
the sick person may make a sacrilegious Communion, leading to his damnation...
"For anyone who
eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on
himself. That is why many among you are ill and infirm, and a considerable
number are dying." (St. Paul, 1 Cor. 11:29-30)
And if that
wasn't bad enough, it should be noted that the sick person who is "passed off to
a lay person" may be deprived of the other sacraments (e.g.
Anointing,
Penance) - which may be validly received only from the hands of a priest -
when they are most necessary to his salvation.
"It is
written (De Consecratione, distinction 12): 'It has come to our knowledge that
some priests deliver the Lord's body to a layman or to a woman to carry it to
the sick: The synod therefore forbids such presumption to continue; and let the
priest himself communicate the sick.'" (St. Thomas Aquinas, Doctor of the Church
and "greatest theologian in the history of the Church")
Etc.
Did you know? Those wishing to avoid harmful
post-Vatican II novelties (including 'lay ministers' handling the Blessed
Sacrament) may, thanks be to God, still lawfully attend the
Traditional Latin Mass. The Traditional Latin ('Tridentine') Mass differs
from the 1960's
Novus Ordo Mass in many & significant ways (try
here for more information). To locate a Traditional Latin Mass in your area,
try
here.
Reminder: We make no guarantee whatsoever regarding any item herein. Items herein may be the opinions of their authors and do not necessarily reflect our views.
All applicable items may be subject to change at any time without notice. Utilize any link(s) appearing on this page at your own risk.
For more terms information, see "Important Notice" below.
|